Davits: Here’s What We Think - Now Tell Us How You Use Them!
Since a catamaran is intrinsically better suited to anchorages than to marinas, the tender is much more than a simple accessory. Its storage and handling are key points of attention during the design phase.
At Excess, we systematically question this topic when designing a new model, so let’s use this article to review the main possible solutions.
We can identify three main families:
-
Classic davits (fixed with blocks and tackle)
-
Pivoting davits
-
Under-platform lifting systems, such as Tenderlift®
Each concept has its advantages and disadvantages, its fans and its detractors.
Classic davits
Advantages:
-
They have the merit of simplicity: few moving parts, fixed to the primary structure of the boat
-
High rigidity in all axes, making them very insensitive to waves and transversal loads
-
Nothing protrudes below the tender, so you get better clearance above the water for a given tender position
-
Compatible with catamarans where the mainsheet track is on the aft beam (such as Excess)
-
Cost-effective
-
Can carry ideally positioned solar panels (out of the boom’s shadow)
-
Allow you to store “toys” in addition to the tender, such as stand-up paddleboards
-
Positioning the tender under the davits is simple and reliable, even in choppy conditions
-
Little to no risk of wear.
Drawbacks:
-
Fixed solution, which often increases the boat’s overall length
-
Need to create proper support points for the tender on the davits and ideally strap it down to avoid any movement during long passages
-
Solution that can appear simplistic, not very modern.
Pivoting davits
Advantages:
-
An attractive solution, as it allows part of the loads to be transferred into the coachroof, thus reducing stresses in the hull
-
Rotational kinematics that move the tender away from the boat when launching, and bring it forward when lifted (generally more compact in the marina)
-
Nothing protrudes below the tender, so you get better clearance above the water for a given tender position
-
Cost-effective solution, requiring little structure
-
Lightweight solution
-
Davits in the lowered position can have an additional function (for example: trampoline)
-
Positioning the tender is simple and reliable, even in choppy conditions
Drawbacks:
-
More vulnerable to lateral loads
-
Difficult to fully secure the tender in position (generally supported on only one side) for long passages
-
Kinematics requiring pins and moving parts, which can wear out more quickly
-
Do not easily allow for the installation of solar panels
-
Incompatible with catamarans where the mainsheet track is on the aft beam (such as Excess)
Under-platform lifting systems
Advantages:
-
Very clean, discreet solution that does not interfere with visibility from the cockpit
-
Multifunction solution, which can serve as a bathing platform when the tender is not on it
-
Conceptually more reassuring: the tender is resting on a support and not hanging (although it still needs to be strapped down!)
Drawbacks:
-
Structure with volume below the platform, increasing impacts with the sea
-
Heaviest solution, requiring significant additional structural reinforcement in the boat
-
More advanced kinematics and more complex mechanics in direct contact with salt water
-
No possibility to carry solar panels or store “toys” independently of the tender
-
The tender has to be positioned very precisely on the chocks, more delicate when the sea is not calm
-
Generally an electric or hydraulic solution, more expensive and potentially more vulnerable
Tell us what you think!
Each of these solutions has its advocates and detractors, but above all the choice must be adapted to the intended use.
Classic davits remain to this day the preferred solution for blue-water cruising yards, while the other concepts are generally reserved for charter-oriented boats or very large luxury yachts.
At Excess, this is the direction we are currently taking, and we strive, model after model, to deliver the most refined solution possible while remaining within the family of classic davits.
We would be very interested in your feedback on the different families mentioned above, and especially in understanding how you actually use your tender:
Do you put it back on the davits every evening? Do you remove it for long passages? Do you often move the engine onto a dedicated bracket or do you systematically leave it on the tender, etc.?
In short, all feedback is welcome — help us keep thinking out of the box!
1) I don’t understand why they are created to turn the dingy to its side when lifted fully. Yes, it helps keep it snug – but I can not find a dingy with a drain plug off to the side of the transom. Large waves and rain will add weight on passages. A few cleats and the use of lateral lines from the dingy’s bow and stern would do.
2) We use the dingy frequently and lifting the 6 HP engine (50 pounds) on and off will someday lead to it being dropped in the water. Ideally, I’d like to keep the engine mounted on a lightweight dingy – but have to make sure that the lifting points on the dingy are wider than the davits or else the motor face/side will grind against the davit arm. (Trying out a highfield 310 hyperlight next as it has no bow locker and the distance between lifting points is 24 inches wider than the 64 inches between the davits.)
3) It seems to me that the arms are too low for solar – anyone sitting on the back bench will hit their head on mounted solar cells.
I’d like a solution that:
1) Lifts the dingy straight up and snug. Use lateral lines with appropriate cleats to aid in securing the dingy. Perhaps incorporate four arms – two for the lift lines (Wider spaced and slightly higher to allow hoist blocks to work without twisting) and two for the top braces that meet the top of the dingy.
2) Allows storage of motor on the transom of the dingy,
3) Can serve as a support for solar cells extending from the coach roof. Let the coach roof bear some of that solar weight.
4) Double the use of those solar cells as shade for the dingy and back bench.
5) With that extra height, have a few cross bars to tie down two inflatable paddleboards between the dingy and the solar cells.
6) Comes from the factory with a hoist line for the port davit that is long enough to reach at least one winch.
As a result, we had to move the nacelle aft to ensure the correct positioning of the mast. The davits therefore extend beyond the aft platforms, making longer gangways necessary.
--
Bonjour Guilherme Araujo,
En effet, nous avons du reculer la nacelle lié au bon emplacement du mât. Les bossoirs dépassent donc en effet des jupes, imposant de mettre de plus longues passerelles.
More speed, better movements and less noise.
You are absolutely right. This topic is covered in more detail in our dedicated article about the aft platforms, which you can read here:
https://lab.excess-catamarans.com/aft-transoms-173
--
Bonjour Geronimo,
Vous avez raison. Ce sujet est abordé plus en détail dans notre article dédié aux jupes arrière, que nous vous invitons à consulter ici :
https://lab.excess-catamarans.com/aft-transoms-173
Eliott - The Excess team
We have chosen a Highfield 290 Ultralight tender with a 2.5hp petrol outboard which will be used mostly by the two of us for resupply, visiting other yachts, exploring, snorkelling and diving trips. We wanted a lightweight tender for beach landings in more remote places, but also to keep our yacht light and balanced as we will install 3 x 450 Watt solar on the davits.
We will usually hoist our tender each night. It is easy on the Excess 13 with the electric winch aft. We do this for a few reasons 1. insurers prefer it 2. we can raise anchor and manoeuvre quickly 3. the tender and outboard will last longer in the shade under the solar panels.
We will move the engine to the bracket on short passages in rough seas and stow it in a locker on longer passages.
We will keep the tender on the davits for longer passages as it is a RIB. But we will lash it well so no movement occurs. We think the davits on the Excess 13 are high enough that this will be okay in rough seas.
Hope this helps the discussion
Roy & Vicki
Your experience and the way you explain your choices are very valuable and bring concrete insight to the discussion. We really appreciate your contribution.
--
Merci beaucoup, Roy & Vicki, pour ce retour très clair et détaillé.
Votre expérience et la manière dont vous expliquez vos choix apportent un éclairage concret et enrichissent réellement la discussion. Merci pour votre contribution.